In 1994 the South African government announced that it
intended re-equipping the air force and navy. Four years later, the arms deal
was signed and so began a saga that has seldom been far from the news
President Zuma came under the firing line again this
Thursday when the Leader of the Democratic Alliance in Parliament, Lindiwe
Mazibuko asked him whether he intended to release the full and unexpurgated
final report to be produced by the commission and whether steps would be taken
against the persons that may be implicated in the report.
We live in a country governed by the nominal concept of democracy
which has made it possible for the public to become involved with regards to
the Arms deal & what exactly went down. However along with the democracy
there happens to be a fair amount of corruption as well.
There is a great deal
of public concern about the fact that this report will not be made public
because it might implicate some senior members of government, even senior
members of your own Cabinet.
"I honestly
believe that if you think the public interest and the principles to which you
are enjoined are the issue at heart, then you have to commit to this House that
you will release the report and you will make it public within a reasonable
timeframe, say three months of it being tabled to you, in order to give the
public the assurance that this government will not tolerate corruption within
its senior ranks," said Mazibuko.
Why does government feel the need to expose only what they
want the public to know? Are we to, not entitled to be in the know?
Two years ago the
arms deal only cost SA approximately R47-billion. It had then ballooned from
the initial cost of approximately R30-billion.The arms deal has cost the South
Africa public over R70-billion.
With figures like that, I think it is only fair that
President Zuma ‘fess up the findings as
per the commissioner who has sweeping powers to search and seize, subpoena
witnesses and to compel them to answer questions.
Seems like the President to easily forgets that the same people
who elected him into power April 2009 are the very same who can leave him position
less. With democratic elections only one year away, these questions need to be
answered.
No comments:
Post a Comment